Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.0.) in /home/tutogpcg/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5226
http://schema.org/Product" id="product-508" class="product post-508 type-product status-publish product_cat-eng-106 product_tag-eng-106-complete-assignments product_tag-eng-106-gcu-all-assignments product_tag-eng-106-grand-canyon-all-week-assignments product_tag-eng106gcuallassignments product_tag-eng106grandcanyonallweekassignments first instock downloadable virtual purchasable product-type-simple">
Placeholder
Notice: id was called incorrectly. Product properties should not be accessed directly. Backtrace: require('wp-blog-header.php'), require_once('wp-includes/template-loader.php'), include('/plugins/woocommerce/templates/single-product.php'), wc_get_template_part, load_template, require('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/content-single-product.php'), do_action('woocommerce_before_single_product_summary'), WP_Hook->do_action, WP_Hook->apply_filters, call_user_func_array, woocommerce_show_product_images, wc_get_template, include('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/single-product/product-image.php'), do_action('woocommerce_product_thumbnails'), WP_Hook->do_action, WP_Hook->apply_filters, call_user_func_array, woocommerce_show_product_sale_flash, wc_get_template, include('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/single-product/sale-flash.php'), wc_get_template, include('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/loop/sale-flash.php'), WC_Abstract_Legacy_Product->__get, wc_doing_it_wrong Please see /home/tutogpcg/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5226

Notice: id was called incorrectly. Product properties should not be accessed directly. Backtrace: require('wp-blog-header.php'), require_once('wp-includes/template-loader.php'), include('/plugins/woocommerce/templates/single-product.php'), wc_get_template_part, load_template, require('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/content-single-product.php'), do_action('woocommerce_before_single_product_summary'), WP_Hook->do_action, WP_Hook->apply_filters, call_user_func_array, woocommerce_show_product_images, wc_get_template, include('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/single-product/product-image.php'), do_action('woocommerce_product_thumbnails'), WP_Hook->do_action, WP_Hook->apply_filters, call_user_func_array, woocommerce_show_product_sale_flash, wc_get_template, include('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/single-product/sale-flash.php'), wc_get_template, include('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/loop/sale-flash.php'), WC_Abstract_Legacy_Product->__get, wc_doing_it_wrong Please see
/home/tutogpcg/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5226

Notice: id was called incorrectly. Product properties should not be accessed directly. Backtrace: require('wp-blog-header.php'), require_once('wp-includes/template-loader.php'), include('/plugins/woocommerce/templates/single-product.php'), wc_get_template_part, load_template, require('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/content-single-product.php'), do_action('woocommerce_before_single_product_summary'), WP_Hook->do_action, WP_Hook->apply_filters, call_user_func_array, woocommerce_show_product_images, wc_get_template, include('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/single-product/product-image.php'), do_action('woocommerce_product_thumbnails'), WP_Hook->do_action, WP_Hook->apply_filters, call_user_func_array, woocommerce_show_product_sale_flash, wc_get_template, include('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/single-product/sale-flash.php'), wc_get_template, include('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/loop/sale-flash.php'), WC_Abstract_Legacy_Product->__get, wc_doing_it_wrong Please see

ENG 106 Grand Canyon All Week Assignments


Notice: id was called incorrectly. Product properties should not be accessed directly. Backtrace: require('wp-blog-header.php'), require_once('wp-includes/template-loader.php'), include('/plugins/woocommerce/templates/single-product.php'), wc_get_template_part, load_template, require('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/content-single-product.php'), do_action('woocommerce_single_product_summary'), WP_Hook->do_action, WP_Hook->apply_filters, call_user_func_array, yit_single_page_nav_links, wc_get_template, include('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/single-product/nav-links.php'), WC_Abstract_Legacy_Product->__get, wc_doing_it_wrong Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.0.) in /home/tutogpcg/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5226

Notice: id was called incorrectly. Product properties should not be accessed directly. Backtrace: require('wp-blog-header.php'), require_once('wp-includes/template-loader.php'), include('/plugins/woocommerce/templates/single-product.php'), wc_get_template_part, load_template, require('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/content-single-product.php'), do_action('woocommerce_single_product_summary'), WP_Hook->do_action, WP_Hook->apply_filters, call_user_func_array, yit_single_page_nav_links, wc_get_template, include('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/single-product/nav-links.php'), WC_Abstract_Legacy_Product->__get, wc_doing_it_wrong Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.0.) in /home/tutogpcg/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5226

$158.00

Quantity:

Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.0.) in /home/tutogpcg/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5226
508" />

Deprecated: WC_Product::get_categories is deprecated since version 3.0! Use wc_get_product_category_list instead. in /home/tutogpcg/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4774
Category: .
Deprecated: WC_Product::get_tags is deprecated since version 3.0! Use wc_get_product_tag_list instead. in /home/tutogpcg/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4774
Tags: , , , , .

Description

ENG 106 Grand Canyon All Week Assignments

ENG106

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 1 Assignments

Assignment 1

Details:

Continue to improve and hone your persuasive writing skills by completing the following assignment. Studying these techniques will help you incorporate them into your own writing.

  1. Complete the “Claim, Warrant, and Grounds Worksheet.”
  2. GCU style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
  3. Submit the completed worksheet to your instructor.

 

Assignment 2

Details:

Skilled writers use a variety of argumentative strategies to help them write persuasively. Studying these techniques will help you incorporate them into your own writing.

  1. Complete the “Argumentative Strategies Worksheet.”
  2. GCU style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
  3. Submit the completed worksheet to your instructor.

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 2 Peer Review Assignment for the Definition Argument

Peer Review Worksheet: Definition Argument

Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback.

Name of the draft’s author:

Name of the peer reviewer:

Reviewer

After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3-5 sentences) of the paper that includes your assessment of how well the essay meets the assignment requirements as specified in the syllabus and the rubric.

After a second, closer reading of the draft, answer each of the following questions. Positive answers will give you specific elements of the draft to praise; negative answers will indicate areas in need of improvement and revision. Please be sure to indicate at least three positive aspects of the draft and at least three areas for improvement in reply to the questions at the bottom of this worksheet.

Definition Argument Content and Ideas

How effectively does the thesis statement identify the main points that the writer would like to make in this definition argument?

How successfully does the argument focus on explaining and justifying a specific definition? If the writer uses resemblance arguments, how successfully were they used?

How persuasively is evidence used to justify ideas and enrich the essay?

How effectively does the essay incorporate supporting strategies such as the criteria-match pattern described in Chapter 11 of Writing Arguments?

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 2 Assignment Definition Argument First Draft

(This assignment is adapted from Chapter 11 of Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings.)

Write a 1,500-1,750-word essay using five to seven academic resources in which you argue that a borderline or contested case fits (or does not fit) within a given category. To do so, first select a controversial case (which you might find in the news). Decide what category you think your case belongs in, with the understanding that others may disagree with you about the definition of your category, and/or whether your chosen case matches your category.

In the opening of your essay, introduce the borderline or contested case you will examine and pose your definition question. To support your argument, define the boundaries of your category (criteria) by using a commonly used definition or by developing your own extended definition.

In the second part of your argument (the match), show how your case meets or does not meet your definition criteria. Use resemblance arguments, perhaps by comparing your controversial case to other cases, to develop your argument.

Follow one of the organization plans for definition arguments in chapter 11 of the textbook.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Submit this assignment to your instructor and you must also post this draft as an attachment in the Week 2 Peer Review forum by Day 3 of Week 2.

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 2 Assignment Peer Review Forum: Definition

After submitting the first draft of your Definition Argument essay in Topic 2, post the first draft as a reply to this thread. You should label your paper and the subject line of your reply with your first name and last name (e.g., Karen Palmer’s Paper).

Review the draft of the person who posted his or her response directly below yours in the Peer Review forum. If your draft is the last posted, review the first draft posted.

Complete the “Peer Review Worksheet: Definition Argument.” Copy and paste the completed Peer Review to the peer review forum as a response to the initial post of your peer’s first draft. Do not post the worksheet as an attachment.

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 3 Assignment Definition Argument Essay Final Draft A Grade

Revise the draft you have written, utilizing the feedback from your peer review. Complete your revision in conjunction with the guidelines for the first draft assignment given in Week 2.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

 

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 4 Assignment Causal Argument First Draft Benchmark A Grade

Choose an issue about the causes or consequences of a trend, event, or other phenomenon related to the sale or trade of human organs. Write a 1,500–1,750-word argument using five to seven academic resources that persuades an audience to accept your explanation of the causes or consequences of your chosen phenomenon. Within your essay, be sure to do the following:

  1. Examine alternative hypotheses or opposing views and explain your reasons for rejecting them.
  2. Imagine your issue either as a puzzle or as a disagreement. If a puzzle, your task will be to create a convincing case for an audience that does not have an answer to your causal question already in mind. If a disagreement, your task will be more overtly persuasive because your goal will be to change your audience’s views.
  3. Use the structure for a causal argument to write your essay. Outlines for this type of argument are found in chapter 12 of the textbook.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

The final draft of this assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Submit this assignment to your instructor and you must also post this draft as an attachment in the Week 4 Peer Review forum by Day 3 of Week 4.

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 4 Assignment Peer Review Forum: Causal

After submitting the first draft of your Causal Argument essay in Topic 4, post the first draft as a reply to this thread. You should label your paper and the subject line of your reply with your first name and last name (e.g., Karen Palmer’s Paper).

Review the draft of the person who posted his or her response directly below yours in the Peer Review forum. If your draft is the last posted, review the first draft posted.

Complete the “Peer Review Worksheet: Definition Argument.” Copy and paste the completed Peer Review to the peer review forum as a response to the initial post of your peer’s first draft. Do not post the worksheet as an attachment.

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 4 Peer Review Assignment for the Causal Argument

Review the “Rubric Peer Review” media piece for information on effective peer reviews.

Perform a peer review of the draft of the classmate who posted his/her response directly below yours in the Week 4 Peer Review forum. If your draft is the last posted, review the first draft posted.

Use the “Peer Review Worksheet: Causal Argument” to guide your review of a classmate’s paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Copy-and-paste your completed peer review into a Reply to the classmate whose draft you reviewed no later than Day 7 of Week 4. Do not post the worksheet as an attachment.

Submit your completed Peer Review for grading by the end of Week 4.

Use the feedback you received from the Peer Review to revise your own essay. Begin to construct the final draft of your essay.

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 5 Causal Argument Final Draft (Benchmark)

Revise the draft you have written utilizing the feedback from your peer review. Complete your revision in conjunction with the guidelines for the first draft assignment given in Week 4.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 6 Peer Review Assignment for the Proposal

Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback.

Name of the draft’s author:

Name of the peer reviewer:

Reviewer

After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3-5 sentences)of the paper that includes your assessment of how well the essay meets the assignment requirements as specified in the syllabus and the rubric.

After a second, closer reading of the draft, answer each of the following questions. Positive answers will give you specific elements of the draft to praise; negative answers will indicate areas in need of improvement and revision. Please be sure to indicate at least three positive aspects of the draft and at least three areas for improvement in reply to the questions at the bottom of this worksheet.

 

Proposal Content and Ideas

How effectively does the thesis statement identify the main points that the writer would like to make in this proposal?

How successfully does the paper focus on presenting a well-reasoned proposal?

How persuasively is evidence used to justify ideas and enrich the essay?

How effectively does the essay incorporate strategies that support proposals (e.g., categorical, resemblance, ethical claims, and causal claims)?

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 6 Proposal Argument First Draft

Choose ONE of the following two assignments:

(Assignments adapted from chapter 14 of the textbook.)

Option 1: A Practical Proposal Addressing a Local Problem

Write a 1,500-1,750 word practical proposal using five to seven academic resources that offers a solution to a local problem. Your proposal should have three main sections: (1) description of the problem, (2) proposed solution, and (3) justification.

Proposals are usually accompanied by a letter of transmittal—a one-page business letter that introduces the proposal to its intended audience and provides background about the writer.

Document design is important in practical proposals, which are aimed at busy people who have to make many decisions under time constraints. An effective design helps establish the writer’s ethos as a quality-oriented professional and helps make the reading of the proposal as easy as possible. Refer to Megan Johnson’s argument on pages 330–333.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric that can be viewed at the assignment’s drop box. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

 

Option 2: A Policy Proposal as a Guest Editorial

Write a 1,500-1,750 word policy proposal using five to seven academic resources that is suitable for publication as a feature editorial in a college or city newspaper or in a publication associated with a particular group, such as a church newsletter or employee bulletin. The voice and style of your argument should be aimed at readers of your chosen publication. Your editorial should have the following features:

The identification of a problem. Persuade your audience that this is a problem that needs solving; give it presence.

A proposal for action that will help alleviate the problem

A justification of your solution; the reasons why your audience should accept your proposal and act on it.

Chapter 14 includes an outline you can follow to complete your proposal argument.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric that can be viewed at the assignment’s drop box. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 6 Peer Review Forum: Proposal

After submitting the first draft of your Proposal in Topic 6, post the first draft as a reply to this thread. You should label your paper and the subject line of your reply with your first name and last name (e.g., Karen Palmer’s Paper).

Review the draft of the person who posted his or her response directly below yours in the Peer Review forum. If your draft is the last posted, review the first draft posted.

Complete the “Peer Review Worksheet: Proposal Essay.” Copy and paste the completed Peer Review to the peer review forum as a response to the initial post of your peer’s first draft. Do not post the worksheet as an attachment.

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 7 Proposal Argument Final Draft

Revise the draft you have written, utilizing the feedback from your peer review. Complete your revision in conjunction with the guidelines for the first draft assignment given in Week 6.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

There are no reviews yet.

Add your review


Deprecated: WC_Product::get_upsells is deprecated since version 3.0! Use WC_Product::get_upsell_ids instead. in /home/tutogpcg/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4774

Deprecated: WC_Product::get_related is deprecated since version 3.0! Use wc_get_related_products instead. in /home/tutogpcg/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4774

Notice: id was called incorrectly. Product properties should not be accessed directly. Backtrace: require('wp-blog-header.php'), require_once('wp-includes/template-loader.php'), include('/plugins/woocommerce/templates/single-product.php'), wc_get_template_part, load_template, require('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/content-single-product.php'), do_action('woocommerce_after_single_product_summary'), WP_Hook->do_action, WP_Hook->apply_filters, call_user_func_array, woocommerce_output_related_products, woocommerce_related_products, wc_get_template, include('/themes/nielsen/woocommerce/single-product/related.php'), WC_Abstract_Legacy_Product->__get, wc_doing_it_wrong Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.0.) in /home/tutogpcg/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5226

Deprecated: WC_Product::get_related is deprecated since version 3.0! Use wc_get_related_products instead. in /home/tutogpcg/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4774